Jump to content Worldwide-English
HP.com Home Products and Services Support and Drivers Solutions How to Buy
» Contact HP
HP.com home
Blogs index  >   The Digital Mindset Blog  

The Digital Mindset Blog

Content starts here
My name is Eric Kintz and I am the Vice President of Strategy & Marketing for HP's Web Services and Software division. I will discuss marketing, web 2.0 trends, software, digital photography, digital entertainment and anything else that is on my mind. Join the conversation!

If you are new to this blog, check out my favorite posts!

Subscribe
with Bloglines

Add to Technorati Favorites

» HP Blogging Code of Conduct

» Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

“Thou shall post every day” is the most fundamental and most well known principle of blogging. Every new blogger is warned about “the” ultimate rule and is confronted with the pressure of a day going by with no new post. Every one has in mind the examples of successful bloggers, like Robert Scoble at Microsoft, who post several times a day. Daily posting shows that you are serious about blogging, generates traffic and drives reader loyalty, as readers come back daily to check your new posts. You cannot be successful if you do not go by the rule, right? RIGHT?

Wrong. Daily posts are a legacy of a web 1.0 mindset and early web 2.0 days (meaning 12 months ago!). The pressure around posting frequency will ultimately become a significant barrier to the maturity of blogging. Here are 10 reasons why.

#1- Traffic is generated by participating in the community; not daily posting – The blogosphere doubles in size every 6 months and cutting through the clutter will become ever more difficult with a new blog emerging every second. Daily posting deals with the clutter by adding more clutter. Although this strategy made sense 12 months ago and still makes sense for the top bloggers, its effectiveness diminishes with every new blog created. Traffic is generated by successful bloggers linking to you either in their posts or in their blogroll. Mack at Viral Garden has a series of great posts on the importance of joining the community.

#2 – Traffic is irrelevant to your blog’s success anyway– Unless you specifically target bloggers like Bruce, are a blogging consultant or blog about your latest book, traffic is irrelevant to you. What matters most is whether you are reaching your target audience (which may be narrow and focused), not necessarily how many people read your posts. Engaging with the audience you want to have a relationship with is a much smarter strategy than posting frequently

#3- Loyal readers coming back daily to check your posts is so web 1.0 – As the blogosphere matures, the number of new readers and bloggers will decrease and loyal readers are going to matter more. I have heard many bloggers tell me that they will lose reader loyalty if these readers come back daily and do not see any new posts. This perception is still very strong although irrelevant. Loyal readers subscribe to your blog via RSS feeds and have new content pushed to them. They will remain loyal because they have subscribed, not because you post frequently.

#4 - Frequent posting is actually starting to have a negative impact on loyalty: Seth Godin (a frequent blogger) has a very interesting theory. According to him, RSS fatigue is already setting in. With too many posts, you run the risk of losing loyal readers, overwhelmed by the clutter you generate. Readers will start to tune off if your blog takes up too much of their time

#5: Frequent posting keeps key senior executives and thought leaders out of the blogosphere

My colleagues and industry peers cite bandwidth constraints as the number one reason for not blogging. They are absolutely right: frequent posting is not very compatible with a high pressure job. As an example, not one single blog is authored by a senior corporate marketing blogger in the top 25 marketing blogs listed by Mack. Not only does the blogosphere lose valuable thought leadership, it runs the risk of being overlooked by these very same marketers. A recent study by Forrester found a reluctance among marketers to shift from more tried-and-true online channels like search and e-mail marketing. Just 13 percent reported using blogs or social networks in marketing, and 49 percent said they had no plans to do so in the next year. If the blogosphere wants to become more mainstream (vs. being the latest hype), frequent posting and required bandwidth are undoubtedly a major barrier to adoption.

#6: Frequent posting drives poor content quality – The pressure of daily posting drives many bloggers to re-purpose other bloggers’ content or give quick un-insightful comments on the news. Few bloggers have enough time (or expertise) to write daily thought leadership pieces, thus adding to the clutter. Ben at the Church of the Customer Blog explores the 1% rule and cites the Wikipedia example: 25 million readers visit Wikipedia every month, but the number of people who actually contribute content to Wikipedia is about 1-2 percent of total site visitors. I would argue that the same is valid for the blogosphere as a whole where most of the original high value content is driven by 1% of the bloggers. Some of the most insightful –and most quoted- marketing thought blogging leaders are actually infrequent posters, from Sam Decker to Charlene Li or Randi Baseler.

#7: Frequent posting threatens the credibility of the blogosphere – as many bloggers re-purpose existing content under the pressure of daily posting, they do not take the time to do any sort of due diligence and conduct effective research. Errors snowball in the blogosphere as they spread from one blogger to the other. The collective wisdom of user generated content was supposed to provide an alternative to biased traditional media content – it is instead echoing the thoughts and biases of a few.

#8 - Frequent posting will push corporate bloggers into the hands of PR agencies – As they struggle with bandwidth constraints as well as peer pressure to join the blogosphere, more and more companies will resort to partnering with their PR agencies to create blogs. The blogosphere will in turn lose some of its effectiveness and value.

#9 - Frequent posting creates the equivalent of a blogging landfill – According to Technorati, only 55% of bloggers post after 3 months of existence. The pressure of the first months to write frequently certainly contributes to people abandoning their blogs. Is that in the blogosphere’s best interest to have a third of its participants frustrated by their initial efforts?

#10 - I love my family too much - Ann pointed out to me this cool blog that highlights the challenges of BA – Bloggers Anonymous. Very funny…..

If you want to be a top 50 Technorati blogger, you will most probably still need to post several times a day. But for the rest of us, we should think seriously about the added value of frequent blogging. Actually, according to Technorati, only 11% of all blogs update weekly or more. What will matter more and more is what you write and how you engage, not how often you write. As the blogosphere matures, the measure of success will shift from traffic to reader loyalty. As Seth Godin says in his post, “blogging with restraint, selectivity, cogency and brevity (okay, that's a long way of saying "making every word count") will use attention more efficiently and ought to win”. As for me, I will continue to post only when I have something to say.


UPDATE Oct 06: This post has been referenced more than 150 times in the blogosphere. Read the analysis on how it spread virally.

Posted by Eric Kintz on Monday, June 05, 2006 3:41 PM
PermalinkTrackbacks (19) Comments(34)

Comments for Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Eric --Interesting perspective. I liked a few things you said, in particular: "Traffic is generated by participating in the community; not daily posting." In other words, participating on other blogs is as important as participating in your own. "Traffic is irrelevant to your blog’s success anyway." Or, all traffic is not created equal. Generally, it depends on what your goals are...as you suggested at the end: the Huffington Post has a different blogging strategy than, for example, Eric Kintz. Anyway, good reminder than all blogs are not the same, and all bloggers don't have the same goals and therefore needn't follow the same prescription. Oh -- and I almost forgot -- you *don't* want to end up like those sad chaps on Bloggers Anon!

Posted by ann@marketingprofs.com on 6/5/2006 8:10 PM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

BA? Ha! I can quit if I want to... errr.... brb, I have toi blog about you blog :)

Posted by jlrevilla on 6/5/2006 8:14 PM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Great post. I recently removed Hugh of gapingvoid from my feed because he posts so much it fills the screen on my rss reader. Besides he seems less interesting now that he's the Louis Vuton of the blogophere (the photo of Hugh whining about signing "so many posters" did it for me). Boy, with the latest GodinGate etc. I wonder if someone needs to start the blog equivilent of "jumped the shark" for A-Listers :-) Posted by: karl long on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:30 PM
» Permalink 


excellent thoughts, Eric!!!! although aggregating by Technorati tags still puts the most recent blog posts at the top of the page. very true about keeping senior exects. out of the blogosphere. well done!!!!!!!! Posted by: andrew jones on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:30 PM
» Permalink 


Post early in the morning. Post often. "Do this, don't do that, can't you read the signs?" (I'm singing that in the office) Like all marketing (if you consider blogging marketing), targeting it to the appropriate niche is always the way to go. Find out what readers want, expect and need from you as a blogger, otherwise you'll be overwhelmed with "blogging advice" from people that may not (and likely do not) understand your target market. There may be a few fundamentals to blogging well (write good content, link to others, etc.) but in terms of things like frequency, time of day, etc. I think we're going to see more and more dissenting and varied opinions. And the debate will only heat up. Posted by: Ben Yoskovitz on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:31 PM
» Permalink 


I agree with these comments. Quality content posted once or twice a week is far more important than pithy comments posted seven or ten times a week. Posted by: Kevin Hillstrom on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:31 PM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Eric I've told you this privately, but I just wanted to add that it's so refreshing to see a corporate blogger making such an effort to join the blogging community, and get involved with other bloggers in THEIR space. I've seen you commenting everywhere, on A-Lister blogs, down to blogs that likely only get a handful of visitors a day. You haven't been interested in getting links, just getting involved with the community at their level. I think it's great, and HP would be very wise to listen to the ideas you will be taking back from the community. Posted by: Mack Collier on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:33 PM
» Permalink 


"As for me, I will continue to post only when I have something to say." You hit the nail on the head there. Which is why trying to blog about something you're not really passionate about is a sure sign to failure. Good piece here Eric, thank you. Posted by: Jim Kukral on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:33 PM
» Permalink 


Really good post Eric. Lots of food for thought. I agree with both you and Seth re: RSS fatigue. I am now starting to selectively ignore the feeds that just keep multiplying day after day (and by this I don't mean one post a day but several). It's tough to keep up with all the quality content out there while trying to sort through the clutter of hit-and-run posts (i.e. check out this link or 'wow, look at this cool new campaign'). Posted by: Tamera Kremer on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:34 PM
» Permalink 


This is something that's been floating around in my head for about 2 or 3 months. I have been so busy at work, I haven't posted on a daily basis as I used to... and lo! and behold! my traffic didn't suffer a bit. I think this is a wise post, with wise information. Write when you have something worth saying, write to your audience, and do your best to write well. It can't get any simpler than that. Of course, then there's the likes of Steve Rubel who posts numerous times a day. Offering links to this and that. Sometimes useful, other times just jibber-jabber. But, that's his style. And, he doesn't drone on and on. That's also key - I often tend to write too much. I think it's time to scale back. Glad I stopped by. Posted by: Yvonne DiVita on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:34 PM
» Permalink 


Frequent blogging, like frequent writing, is a discipline and, in theory, should result in a higher quality of stuff. But we all know that isn't the case. Most of the stuff posted on blogs isn't all that great or all that insightful. But does that mean we shouldn't post frequently? Should a daily newspaper go to a weekly or twice-weekly format because the bulk of its daily content is ignored by the majority of readers? Should USA Today quit publishing its Money section because the Wall Street Journal provides much more comprehensive coverage and is more often read by the influentials? Just wondering. AC Posted by: Andrew on Marketing Profs| 06.06.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/6/2006 5:35 PM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Agree with Ann. If your writing a business blog it should be integrated into your overall marketing plan and support goals/objectives. If the goal is to establsh thought leadership than longer blogs posted less frequently might be the way to go. However, if the goal is to become the "go to" space for news about the latest and greatest in a rapidly changing industry multiple daily posts might be in order. Bottom-line look to your goals and objectives to determine frequency of postings.

Posted by Toby Lyn on 6/7/2006 3:32 PM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Phew! My computer screen was starting to glare at me for not posting often enough. What a relief! I, too, would much rather write useful posts less frequently than repurpose other bloggers' content when I can't come up with original ideas. There is too much repurposed and redundant material in my inbox already. Thanks for bringing this issue into sharper focus. Posted by: Monica Powers on Marketing Profs| 06.07.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:40 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

One thing that is very useful is to set the expectation for updates. The Sharps Barber blog has a note on it that it is updated on wednesdays and fridays. Not a bad idea to set the expectation. Actually the scheduling aspect of new media was recently debated on Joe Jaffe's podcast "across the sound". He was interviewing the guys behind the "american copywriter podcast and lamenting there lacsidasical attitude to their schedule (apparently they dont' always make it on wednesday). One of the interesting comments toward the end of the debate was "media that we can consume on our schedule should be created with the same philosophy". Here's a link to the podcast Posted by: Karl Long MArketing Profs| 06.07.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:41 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Thanks for this. I knew something had changed because the traffic was harder to get. I really appreciate the insight. I'm trying to gather personal consumer stories from the blogsphere and have been amazed that only a few commments have come back http://www.consumertells.blogspot.com My other blog, www.mediarelations.blogs.com has had no trouble with traffic because it is targeted to a group of professionals I know. Posted by: Jeri Cartwright on Marketing Profs| 06.07.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:42 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

I agree. Originally when I first started my blog over half a year ago, I was posting and pushing posts through in a frantic pace practically daily. I sustained that feverish pace for a while until I was feeling the tension of always trying to push something "on time". I was starting to get burnt out, and didn't want to write anymore since it was such a chore, etc. Then, I decide to take it a bit easy and try posting less frequent until I finally think I've settled on posting once a week. It takes me way too much time to do my posts as well as research, creating the Flash simulations, preparations, etc and I'm surprised that I was able to do it so crazily then. Now, I have a bit more time to spend with my family and it's nice to balance things out. We have rss feeds and isn't that what it's really for? To let someone who subscribed to know when you have new material so that they don't have to visit your site everyday looking for something that isn't there. Thanks for reading. Posted by: May C on Marketing Profs| 06.07.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:42 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Eric -- are you just trying to trick the rest of us into posting less??? (j/k) Quality trumps quantity every time. Not just in posts, but in the quality of the readers you cultivate. Posted by: Ike on Marketing Profs| 06.07.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:43 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

This is brilliant, and I pray to god you are right because I can not stand being forced to make crappy posts when I have nothing thought provoking or provacative to say. I know I do not subscribe to gizmodo anymore because they started posting 20 times daily, and 80 percent of it started to be junk. Posted by: Brian on Marketing Profs| 06.07.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:43 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

This is an excellent article but I think that the nature of your blog. For exmaple, my blog is about SOuth Asian Business and I cover business sectors of nearly 8 countries. So, naturally, if I do not post daily more than once, I will not get good readership. Posted by: Razib Ahmed on Marketing Profs| 06.08.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:44 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Right on Eric! Way back in the Web 1.0 days (last year) I tried to post daily even multiple times each day but found myself just regurgitating news stories and posting links. Reposting news stories is exactly what I didn’t want to do. If there was an issue out there that really fascinated me I wanted to digest the information, formulate an opinion, and effectively communicate it through my blog. One day I said screw it, it's not worth losing my job or family over, plus it's My Blog Anyway! I pay the bill, nobody else. I should be able to post what I want when I want to. I don't get paid to do it so why stress out over the daily posting think. As a result I’ve decided to only post when I have something to say and only after I have had time to really think through the issues. Posted by: Merrell Ligons on Marketing Profs| 06.08.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:45 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Whew! I've been writing a blog on customer service and only post on Mondays and Thursdays. I've been feeling guilty on the one hand about not posting more often, yet struggling at the same time to provide relevant information that will keep people coming back. I think I'll print your post, blow it up to poster size and hang it on the wall I face in my office.-) Posted by: Glenn Ross on Marketing Profs| 06.08.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:45 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Interesting observations and as one who has recently taken up blogging for the pleasure of writing I understand how easy it is to fall into the trap of posting several times every day. It certainly doesn't improve the quality of the blog and quality, not quantity, is what I've enjoyed on other blogs - including this one. Posted by: Amin on Marketing Profs| 06.08.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/8/2006 11:46 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

This is funny -- I read this post on the way home last night and nearly cheered out loud on the train! Then I read a post on another blog and nearly quoted you in the comments. Then I realized that they had linked to you already. Great article. Posted by: CarlenLea on Marketing Profs| 06.08.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/13/2006 11:10 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Focusing on post frequency is a waste of time. Always has been. Always will be. What matters is the quality of your content, not the frequency or lack thereof. Post when you have something to say. Don't post when you don't. THAT is what should determine frequency. THAT is the beauty of blogging: no artifical deadlines. Posted by: RBL on Marketing Profs| 06.08.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/13/2006 11:11 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Since I'm just now reorganizing my site + blogs, this is just the kind of information I need. However, for those whose purpose is to get as many page hits as they can to puff up their ad hit count, quality isn't important: the blog text is there to hold together the ads. I'm not one of them but it's important to know which kind of blog we're talking about. Posted by: Dave McLane on Marketing Profs| 06.09.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/13/2006 11:12 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Depends on your blog strategy. If your posts have a very definitive "theme" and they all relate to eachother—I don't see frequency as much of an issue. I could be wrong... Great discussion on this one. I joined it late (too busy over-posting). Wonder if I'll be the last? :) Posted by: David Armano on Marketing Profs| 06.09.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/13/2006 11:12 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Initially I read this for fodder for justifying why I have not been blogging as I used to. I help run a company for bloggers for Chrissakes! And I've been blogging less. Instead of a backrub I got something much better--real facts to back up what I've been sensing. More blogging ain't always better blogging. Many bloggers who are monetizing their blogs via advertising feel similar pressure, but reading Yvonne's comment I think that even on days you do not post it, folks will come. And if they are chronically late blog readers like me, they'll use the opportunity to dig into older stuff if there's nothing new. Great post! Posted by: Jory Des Jardins on Marketing Excellence| 06.09.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/13/2006 11:13 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Hi. I just want to confess first that I am realtively new to blogging and have never posted a comment on another bloggers site. So I hope I'm doing this right. That said, I think there are a couple of things missing from this discussion: 1. Why is it so bad if PR people end up writing corporate blogs? They will figure out how to do it well because if they don't, no one will read their stuff. 2. People who give opinions on a given topic professionally -- like, that is what they do for a living -- presumably will have fewer problems being interesting every day on their blog. Penelope Trunk Posted by: Penelope Trunk on Marketing Profs| 06.10.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/13/2006 11:14 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Hilarious. I was forwarded this from a colleague who gave me a "see? In your face!" comment. See, I blog everyday and he blogs infrequently. I don't know if this is as much a discussion as it is validation for the masses not blogging everday. I think it is great information Eric, but bloggers are all wired differently. I don't blog everyday because I want more audience. I blog because I have something to say. Part of the charm (in my mind) is that this is a place for me to comment on today even if the comment is that nothing is going on. That's what people can take from it, that's it's always there for consumption. Great blog by the way. Posted by: justin on Marketing Profs| 06.12.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/13/2006 11:15 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

I agree with you that a blog's success can't just be measured on the level of posting activity but in terms of quality and sustainability. In my case, for as long as my mailing list continues to grow, regardless whether people comment in my articles or not, I'm pretty much happy. Posted by: Janette Toral on Marketing Profs| 06.13.06

Posted by erickintz on 6/13/2006 11:15 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Eric - good stuff. Hard to tell that you just recently jumped in to the world of blogging. I'm going to reference your post on my site - your ideas are just 2.0'ish enough to create a lively dialogue about blogging. Look forward to more good stuff, Dennis Smith Sr. Mgr, Talent Acquisition - Engineering T-Mobile

Posted by smithtx@gmail.com on 6/29/2006 4:55 PM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Thanks for an excellent entry. Certainly brings new meaning to the phrase -- publish or perish -- and takes the pressure off on a Friday night when I am trying to think of Monday's topic. Dan Greenfield

Posted by dangtech2000 on 7/15/2006 12:06 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

I have trouble thinking of things to write constantly and as a managing director it can be difficult to find the time to not only think of subjects to write about but also to articulate my opinion of it. It is so difficult thinking of things that interest me, would interest the readers, and talk about it in a way that no one else has done previously and run a business. I agree wholeheartedly with the comments about quality over quantity, and I often get lost or just give up in the swamp of postings.

Posted by Stephen Waddington on 7/25/2006 6:04 AM
» Permalink 
Re: Why blog post frequency does not matter anymore

Ah, permission to breathe... I feel better already.

Posted by llbarkat on 10/11/2006 11:32 AM
» Permalink 

Apr May 2008 Jun
SMTWTFS
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

XML Feeds
» HP RSS Feeds

Recent blog entries

» HP and Sony Pictures Home Entertainment Licensing Agreement Announcement
» HP to acquire Exstream Software
» In Case you have been living under a Rock – Snapfish at 9 Cents
» Predictions 2008 – battle of the giants between Microsoft and Google
» Going Wild with Pumpkins thanks to HP and Snapfish
» "What Do You Have to Say?" with Gwen Stefani
» Mobile Social Marketing – Digital Mindset Goes Mobile
» Videoblogging from NYC – The print 2.0 revolution
» US Tennis Open and Serena Williams
» HP Photosmart A826 Home Photo Center – Have Fun Creating Personalized Memories
» What do you have to say (about your business)?
» HP Ignites the Print 2.0 Revolution With Gwen Stefani
» Print 2.0 Launch on August 28 - Save the Date!
» What’s In a Name? Marketing Excellence Becomes Digital Mindset
» Barry Bonds 756th Home Run Available on DVD from HP and MLB
» The 3 Ps of Social Publishing in a Twitter, Facebook and Youtube World
» Michel Gondry and the HP Pavillion Media Center PC

Other Blogs

» Archie Reed's Secure Observations Blog
» CSR in Europe, Middle East and Africa
» HP’s Enterprise Printing Blog
» HP's Graphic Arts Blog
» Mobility and All Things Untethered by Ozzie Diaz
» Research, Technology, & Teamwork blog by Susie Wee
» Small business marketing toolbox
» Susan Underhill's Blog on Human Capital Management
» The Changing Face of Media
» The Digital Mindset Blog
» The Inkjet Printing Blog
» The Strategic View
» Weekly Knowledge Management blog by Stan Garfield


Printable version
Privacy statement Using this site means you accept its terms