United States-English

The HP LaserJet blog by Vince Ferraro

HP Responds to Australian Printer Study

Published 03 August 2007, 03:24 PM

I know many of you have heard of a study that was published earlier this week by the Queensland University of Technology. The report findings suggested that ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions from laser printing systems (hp included) are associated with special health risks–and that these risks are comparable to the health risk of inhaling second hand smoke from cigarettes. We take the safety of our products very seriously and I believe we build products that are safe and meet all relevant environmental standards and emissions limits. This issue is being actively looked into at the highest levels within hp’s imaging and printing business.

Below is HP’s statement on this topic:

“After a preliminary review of the Queensland University of Technology research on particle emission characteristics of office printers, HP does not agree with its conclusion or some of the bold claims the authors have made recently in press reports.

HP stands behind the safety of its products. Testing of ultrafine particles is a very new scientific discipline. There are no indications that ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions from laser printing systems are associated with special health risks. Currently, the nature and chemical composition of such particles–whether from a laser printer or from a toaster–cannot be accurately characterized by analytical technology.

However, many experts believe that many of the UFPs found in common household and office products are not discrete solid particles, but may be condensation products or small droplets created during thermal processes. HP agrees more testing in this area is needed, which is why we’ve been active with two of the world’s leading independent authorities on this subject: Air Quality Sciences in the United States and the Wilhelm-Klauditz Institute in Germany.

Vigorous tests are an integral part of HP’s research and development and its strict quality-control procedures. HP LaserJet printing systems, original HP print cartridges and papers are tested for dust release and possible material emissions and are compliant with all applicable international health and safety requirements. In addition to meeting or exceeding these guidelines, HP’s design criteria for its laser printing systems incorporate guidelines from both the Blue Angel Program in Germany and the Greenguard Program in the United States.

Based on our own testing, HP knows that many variables can affect the outcome of tests for ultrafine particle emissions. Although HP is not aware of all of the specific methodologies used in the Queensland study, based on what we’ve seen in the report–as well as our own work in this area–we do not believe there is a link between printer emissions and any public health risk. Specifically, HP does not see an association between printer use by customers and negative health effects for volatile organic compounds, ozone or dust. While we recognize ultrafine, fine, and coarse particles are emitted from printing systems, these levels are consistently below recognized occupational exposure limits.

HP hopes to learn more from the study authors about how products were chosen for the study, how ranges were determined given no standards exist, and many other factors that could have influenced the results.Customer choice is important to us at HP and we know our customers do their homework–whether it’s about print quality, price or safety–before making purchasing decisions. As we continue to look at the facts around printer emissions, we found this perspective from Berkeley Lab interesting and maybe you will, too.”

Posted By Vince Ferraro | 6 Comments | Trackbacks | Permalink
Filed under: , ,


Comments

No Comments
Information disclosed in this community becomes public. Exercise caution when deciding to disclose your personal information. HP reserves the right, but is not obligated to, edit or remove your comment if it contains personally identifiable information or other content HP deems unacceptable.  Opinions expressed are your personal opinions or those of the original authors, and not of HP. Please see HP's web Terms of Use for more details.