|
|
|
|
|
These days everybody is thinking about Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) as the core networking technology for their enterprise local area network (LAN). Reason why organizations are thinking about MPLS is segmentation of groups of users, business units etc. My opinion about MPLS is that it’s difficult and very expensive protocol to manage. Within an enterprise LAN administration must be simple to reduce operation costs. A protocol like MPLS is complex to manage and troubleshoot. Another disadvantage is the price for the MPLS equipment. If segmentation is the requirement for these organizations HP ProCurve has the optimal solution ‘MPLS per user’.
Hewlett Packard, HP, ProCurve, Network, Networking, Tools, Tips, MPLS, Identity management, Architecture |
|
|
| » Read the full content |
|
|
|
| Posted by Dobias van Ingen on Thursday, February 28, 2008 at 7:40:00 AM |
| Permalink
| Trackbacks (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of you will know that the spanning tree protocol is a layer2 protocol which was never designed with maximum security in mind. Over the years, this has resulted in various security configuration options to make sure the end-user edge ports can only perform edge-roles/functions and can't control the entire STP topology anymore.
To facilitate the test process, this small script (written by Peter Debruyne) can help you to demonstrate the advantage of the bpdu-protection and root-guard features.
Hewlett Packard, HP, ProCurve, Network, Networking, Tools, Tips, Spanning Tree, BPDU Protection, Root Guard, STP, Test, Script |
|
|
| » Read the full content |
|
|
|
| Posted by Dobias van Ingen on Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 7:16:00 AM |
| Permalink
| Trackbacks (0)
|
|
| Apr |
May 2008 |
Jun |
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S | | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|
|
| » |
|
|