I use my "computer" (an archaic name, perhaps) as a communicator. Just like I am doing now. It doesn't matter to me if the application was pre-installed, if it was downloaded later, or if it is a web interface. It actually doesn't matter if it is a PC or a smartphone or smoke signals for that matter. The application and hardware are the media, or the vehicle, if you will. The connection between me and the object of interest is most important.

twistedpa1r: Good point. I definitely agree with your idea of understanding computer usage by human experience. Using a computer as a "communicator" is an important experience.

The reason I asked the question the way I did is because I'm trying to understand the implementation that different types of people tend to use- do people prefer to accomplish tasks through client software or through web-based services or are they agnostic like you? Is the preference different for different types of people?

Yes, the term "computer" really does sound archaic! It's come a long way to become the communicator! :)

btw, my colleagues will be visiting you this week. I am sure that you will "knock their socks off" (is there an equivalent hockey term, btw?). Jay Cee

I think the definition of a "platform" evolves over the time. It is moving to higher and higher levels. At the "ancient" :) time, a machine/computer is considered as a platform. I still remember the time when I physically open the box to add memory, harddisk and display card. Later on, Operating system became a platform, just like what you described in the post. This is still true for many users today. Now the browser, which used to be just one application, is becoming the platform. Many services can be accomplished through browser, like SAP, database and etc. Next step, certain web applications may become a platform by itself, e.g., facebook, where developers are writing new applications on it. Just my two cents...

Jay Cee- So twistedpa1r is you! I actually didn't get to meet your colleagues, but they did meet with other colleagues of mine working on mobility. Thank you for visiting and commenting!

Very nice thoughts and comments. Most people do not use computers forthe computing purpose. I believe they use a computer because it provides a nice integration of browsers, communicators, and appliances etc. Most people need to use them from time to time. It is all-in-one service.

If people could be provided just email accessing when they need, and the right appliances when they need, they would not feel the difference whether with or without a computer. At least, I don't mind if it is a terminal or a computer as long as I can easily finish what I want to do. This seems to lead to the computing or service center that could provide such services. It is easy for them to be all-in-one. It also has the mobility advantage if these services are easy-to-access, cheap, fast, user-friendly, etc., which probably is the difficult part.

Hi, I just wanted to comment that I use my laptop as all three simultaneously, and I create redundancy with other computers and consumer electronics devices. As a platform, sometimes I have to create media which require constant upgrades of applications coded with new features (Adobe CS3). But, I also use it as an appliance when it comes to more passive entertainment. I watch 90 percent of video, movies, tv shows on my laptop now (Sling Player). If I want to listen to music, I'll control the speakers with Sonos Desktop. Finally, all of my communique is browser-based with the occasional local back up (gmail, twitter). My iphone is an important mobile tool to all my cloud data which i prefer to local. I don't understand syncing. Its just unnecessary if data is hosted. What is needed now is to integrate the TV so it is not just a slave monitor but an active UI to my data. That would allow laptop to be more of a platform for media creation, etc. and let my TV be the appliance for better passive entertainment. All of them need to have the browser since I like to stay in touch. BTW, found your blog from the IEEE magazine, congrats on the publicity.

zszhang- Very insightful comments on the evolution of the "platform". It is incredible to reflect on how the invention of the computer has led to so many levels of platforms of innovation. What will be the next platform beyond web applications (e.g., facebook)?

sqchen: So you also see people using the computer for "communicating" more than "computing". It is a very interesting to think about the tension between "all-in-one" and "user-friendly"... Can this be achieved?

kangham: You are a superuser and an interesting case study. :) I'd like to learn more about your A/V + IT setup.

You mention that you prefer the cloud to local. Are you "always connected"? How do you feel when you're occasionally disconnected?

I agree about wanting the TV more integrated and to be an active UI, as it seems like very valuable UI real estate. What types of inputs would you like from the TV- keyboard, remote, touch, gestures, ...?

Thanks for commenting and chasing this blog down from the IEEE article!

Susie:

I must admit that I miss your writing.  Your posts have been interesting , insightful and quite useful.  Just the other day, I used one of your meeting tips, in fact.

I hope that your 'hiatus' is short and that you post again soon.

TwistedPair (JCS)

Pingback from  On Top of Splashtop  » Blog Archive   » PC usage as a platform, appliance and browser…